You may have heard the news: two teams of scientists claiming that the West Antarctic Ice Sheet has been irreversibly destablized, leading to a slow-motion process that in some number of centuries will cause 3 meters of sea level rise.
“Today we present observational evidence that a large section of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet has gone into irreversible retreat,” an author of one of the papers, Eric Rignot, a glaciologist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, said at a news conference recently. “It has passed the point of no return.”
A little context might help.

The West Antarctic Ice Sheet is the ice sheet that covers Antarctica on the Western Hemisphere side of the Transantarctic Mountains. The bed of this ice sheet lies well below sea level. The ice gradually flows into floating ice shelves such as the Ross Ice Shelf and Ronne Ice Shelf, and also glaciers that dump ice into the Amundsen Sea. Click on the map to make it bigger, so you can see all these features.
The West Antarctic Ice Sheet contains about 2.2 million cubic kilometers of ice, enough to raise the world’s oceans about 4.8 meters if it all melted. To get a sense of how big it is, let’s visit a crack in one of its outlet glaciers.
In 2011, scientists working in Antarctica discovered a massive crack across the Pine Island Glacier, a major glacier in the West Antarctic Ice Sheet. The crack was 30 kilometers long, 80 meters wide and 60 meters deep. The pictures above and below show this crack—the top one is from NASA, the bottom one was taken by an explorer named Forrest McCarthy.
By July 2013, the crack expanded to the point where a slab of ice 720 square kilometers in size broke off and moved into the Amundsen Sea.
However, this event is not the news! The news is about what’s happening at the bottom of the glaciers of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet.
The West Antarctic Ice Sheet sits in a bowl-shaped depression in the earth, with the bottom of the ice below sea level. Warm ocean water is causing the ice sitting along the rim of the bowl to thin and retreat. As the edge of the ice moves away from the rim and enters deeper water, it can retreat faster.
So, there could be a kind of tipping point, where the West Antarctic Ice Sheet melts faster and faster as its bottom becomes exposed to more water. Scientists have been concerned about this for decades. But now two teams of scientists claim that tipping point has been passed.
Here’s a video that illustrates the process:
And here’s a long quote from a short ‘news and analysis’ article by Thomas Sumner in the 16 May 2014 issue of Science:
A disaster may be unfolding—in slow motion. Earlier this week, two teams of scientists reported that Thwaites Glacier, a keystone holding the massive West Antarctic Ice Sheet together, is starting to collapse. In the long run, they say, the entire ice sheet is doomed. Its meltwater would raise sea levels by more than 3 meters.
One team combined data on the recent retreat of the 182,000-square-kilometer Thwaites Glacier with a model of the glacier’s dynamics to forecast its future. In a paper on page 735, they report that in as few as 2 centuries Thwaites Glacier’s edge will recede past an underwater ridge now stalling its retreat. Their models suggest that the glacier will then cascade into rapid collapse. The second team, writing in Geophysical Research Letters, describes recent radar mapping of West Antarctica’s glaciers and confirms that the 600-meter-deep ridge is the final obstacle before the bedrock underlying the glacier dips into a deep basin.
Because inland basins connect Thwaites Glacier to other major glaciers in the region, both research teams say its collapse would flood West Antarctica with seawater, prompting a near-complete loss of ice in the area over hundreds of years.
“The next stable state for the West Antarctic Ice Sheet might be no ice sheet at all,” says the Science paper’s lead author, glaciologist Ian Joughin of the University of Washington, Seattle. “Very crudely, we are now committed to global sea level rise equivalent to a permanent Hurricane Sandy storm surge,” says glaciologist Richard Alley of Pennsylvania State University, University Park, referring to the storm that ravaged the Caribbean and the U.S. East Coast in 2012. Alley was not involved in either study.
Where Thwaites Glacier meets the Amundsen Sea, deep warm water burrows under the ice sheet’s base, forming an ice shelf from which icebergs break off. When melt and iceberg creation outpace fresh snowfall farther inland, the glacier shrinks. According to the radar mapping released this week in Geophysical Research Letters from the European Remote Sensing satellite, from 1992 to 2011 Thwaites Glacier retreated 14 kilometers. “Nowhere else in Antarctica is changing this fast,” says University of Washington Seattle glaciologist Benjamin Smith, co-author of the Science paper.
To forecast Thwaites Glacier’s fate, the team plugged satellite and aircraft radar maps of the glacier’s ice and underlying bedrock into a computer model. In simulations that assumed various melting trends, the model accurately reproduced recent ice-loss measurements and churned out a disturbing result: In all but the most conservative melt scenarios, a glacial collapse has already started. In 200 to 500 years, once the glacier’s “grounding line”—the point at which the ice begins to float—retreats past the ridge, the glacier’s face will become taller and, like a tower of blocks, more prone to collapse. The retreat will then accelerate to more than 5 kilometers per year, the team says. “On a glacial timescale, 200 to 500 years is the blink of an eye,” Joughin says.
And once Thwaites is gone, the rest of West Antarctica would be at risk.
Eric Rignot, a climate scientist at the University of California, Irvine, and the lead author of the GRL study, is skeptical of Joughin’s timeline because the computer model used estimates of future melting rates instead of calculations based on physical processes such as changing sea temperatures. “These simulations ought to go to the next stage and include realistic ocean forcing,” he says. If they do, he says, they might predict an even more rapid retreat.
I haven’t had time to carefully read the relevant papers, which are these:
• Eric Rignot, J. Mouginot, M. Morlighem, H. Seroussi and B. Scheuchl, Widespread, rapid grounding line retreat of Pine Island, Thwaites, Smith and Kohler glaciers, West Antarctica from 1992 to 2011, Geophysical Research Letters, accepted 12 May 2014.
• Ian Joughin, Benjamin E. Smith and Brooke Medley, Marine ice sheet collapse potentially underway for the Thwaites glacier basin, West Antarctica, Science, 344 (2014), 735–738.
I would like to say something more detailed about them someday.
The paper by Eric Rignot et al. is freely available—just click on the title. Unfortunately, you can’t read the other paper unless you have a journal subscription. Sumner’s article which I quoted is also not freely available. I wish scientists and the journal Science took more seriously their duty to make important research available to the public.
Here’s a video that shows Pine Island Glacier, Thwaites Glacier and some other nearby glaciers:




The Rignot article appears to be freely available online.
Hmm, I hadn’t noticed it was open-access. Thanks!
• Eric Rignot, J. Mouginot, M. Morlighem, H. Seroussi and B. Scheuchl, Widespread, rapid grounding line retreat of Pine Island, Thwaites, Smith and Kohler glaciers, West Antarctica from 1992 to 2011, Geophysical Research Letters, accepted 12 May 2014.
In my experience, writing to the authors often results in receipt of a copy of the paper in question. Yes, they should be more widely disseminated, but many journals are a ‘for profit’ industry. The other thing is, while this is a huge and unprecedented event, the timescale for this disaster’s unfolding is, in terms of human life, slow. If there was sufficient response now, considerable adaptation could take place and this would mitigate many of the impacts, both for humans and, if we were really thoughtful, for other biophysical systems. Thanks, as ever, for your very useful work (and you probably already know the above).
I’ve edited my blog article, adding a lot of new material and removing the grumpy comment that may have prompted your reply. Check out the new pictures and such!
Freely available or not, there is material from a news conference at NASA about this, at http://www.nasa.gov/jpl/earth/antarctica-telecon20140512/#.U3dq7PldV8E.
But, I think, better, is a talk by Professor Richard Alley doing an update on the state of the climate last summer at the AGU Chapman Conference. The link is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_-8u86R3Yc. He covers a lot of stuff and is an expert on many things, but, as a specialist on ice and glaciology, really shines there. It is good to hear the ice story in context.
At 29:30 he begins to talk about Greenland and ice.
At 32:10 he begins to talk about Antarctica.
At 36:30 he begins to talk about the WAIS, the PIG, and so on, speaking from a context before the current findings were known.
Incidently, earlier in the talk, at 26:27, Professor Alley speaks about the great Permian extinction, something which Dr Neil de Grasse Tyson highlighted in the *Cosmos* episode http://www.cosmosontv.com/watch/244543555624.
BTW, I found that *Cosmos* episode profoundly disturbing … Moved me to tears. I tracked down what is apparently the definitive summary of it, Ogden and Sleep, “Explosive eruption of coal and basalt and the end-Permian mass extinction”, *PNAS*, 109(1), 2011, http://www.pnas.org/content/109/1/59.
Hypergeometric wrote:
If you don’t have to pay or have a subscription, that’s what I call ‘freely available’. Thanks!
Thanks again. I’ve been fascinated by the end-Permian extinction ever since I read this book:
• Michael J. Benton, When Life Nearly Died: The Greatest Mass Extinction of All Time, Thames and Hudson, 2003.
Before it happened, the seabeds near China looked something like this:
After it happened, they looked like this:
It took 10 million years for coral reefs to form again after this extinction… and it took 50 million years for biodiversity to fully recover. It was indeed a sad event. It would be sad in a different way if we caused a (probably much smaller) extinction event, since we’re conscious beings who sort of understand what we’re doing.
Indeed, it would probably be much smaller, even if we raised
concentrations to an amount in excess of 1000 ppm quickly, simply because we don’t deposit the majority of it high in atmosphere as apparently the Siberian Traps were able to do, at least according to Ogden and Sleep.
Here’s a helpful article:
• Eric Rignot, Global warming: it’s a point of no return in West Antarctica. What happens next?, The Guardian, 17 May 2014.
[…] 2014/05/16: JCBaez: West Antarctic Ice Sheet News […]
There is no reason to assume “slow.” Overburden release triggers temblors. Friction at the ground-ice interface is lubricative, Catastrophic flow is expected. We must emergency evacuate the Hamptons!
Well, it depends, and we don’t really know. I’m betting half of glaciologists are blowing their jets right now tuning up models to be able to produce a single graph: A three dimensional posterior probability density giving mass to rate of flow per month versus year out for the next 500 years. Glaciers are complicated mechanisms. Even with such a model, which would need to be simulated on one of the Big Guys (supercomputers), needing, at my last check, at least 50m by 50m resolution, there still needs to be fieldwork done to establish good initial conditions. There’s only so much that can be done from satellite and aircraft.
I guess you could bound how fast these could go from what’s been seen elsewhere, like Alaska, and Greenland, per “Chasing Ice”.
[…] 2014/05/16: JCBaez: West Antarctic Ice Sheet News […]
The loss of the 2 million sq kilometre West Antarctic Ice Sheet is likely to have a further effect on global warming due to both a reduction in albedo and a release of trapped methane.
About 400 years ago Galileo got into trouble by putting knowledge on the table in a game with belief systems, and lost. Today most of us would agree that those belief systems were simultaneously driven by, and used as a primary tool, *fear*. Galileo really should have won, we think, if the game would have really been fair.
400 years after the West Antarctica ice sheet disappears– in a complete surprise to almost everybody except people like us (we think)– what will be the consensus then? Somebody of that day and age will of course have to write a book about it, with a title something like–
Galileo and the Failure to Deal with Climate Change: How Belief Systems Create Power, Maintain Ignorance and Destroy Knowledge
Reblogged this on Damn the Matrix.
time for duct tape!
Reblogged this on jameswith and commented:
An interesting read… The West Antarctic Ice Sheet is the ice sheet that covers Antarctica on the Western Hemisphere side of the Transantarctic Mountains. The bed of this ice sheet lies well below sea level. The ice gradually flows into floating ice shelves such as the Ross Ice Shelf and Ronne Ice Shelf, and also glaciers that dump ice into the Amundsen Sea.
The Pine Island and Thwaites ice shelves are both very big and the time scales are long but there are many more ice shelves that are expected to collapse. We only need one metre of sea level rise to bankrupt most economies. http://www.climateoutcome.kiwi.nz/1/post/2015/05/-4-metre-sea-rise-by-2050.html