Ordovician Meteor Event

About 1/3 of the meteorites hitting Earth today come from one source: the L chondrite parent body, an asteroid 100–150 kilometers across that was smashed in an impact 468 million years ago. This was biggest asteroid collision in the last 3 billion years!

Here is an L-chondrite:

A chondrite is a stony, non-metallic meteorite that was formed form small grains of dust present in the early Solar System. They are the most common kind of meteorite—and the three most common kinds, each with its own somewhat different chemical composition, seem to come from different asteroids.

L chondrites are named that because they are low in iron. Compared to other chondrites, a lot of L chondrites have been heavily shocked—evidence that their parent body was catastrophically disrupted by a large impact.

It seems that roughly 500,000 years after this event, lots of meteorites started hitting Earth: this is called the Ordovician meteor event. Big craters from that event still dot the Earth! Here are some in North America:

Number 3 is the Rock Elm Disturbance, created when a rock roughly 170 meters in diameter slammed into what’s now Wisconsin:

It doesn’t look like much now, but imagine what it must have been like! The crater is about 6 kilometers across. It features intensely fractured quartz grain and a faulted rim.

It seems these big L-chondrite meteors hit the Earth roughly in a line:

Of course the continents didn’t look like this when the meteor hit, about 467.5 million years ago.

One big question is: was the Ordovician meteor event somehow connected to the giant increase in biodiversity during the Ordovician? Here’s a graph of biodiversity over time:

The Cambrian explosion gets all the press, but in terms of the sheer number of new families the so-called Ordovician radiation was bigger. Most animal life was undersea at the time. This is when coral reefs and other complex ocean ecosystems came into being!

There are lots of theories that try to explain the Ordovician radiation. For example, the oxygen concentration in the atmosphere and ocean soared right before the start of the Ordovician period. More than one of these theories could be right. But it’s interesting to think about the possible influence of the Ordovician meteor event.

There were a lot of meteor impacts, but the dust may have been more important. Right now, extraterrestrial dust counts for just 1% of all dust in the Earth’s atmosphere. In the Ordovician, the amount of extraterrestial dust was 1,000 – 10,000 times greater, due to the big smash-up in the asteroid belt! This may have caused the global cooling we see in that period. The Ordovician started out hot, but by the end there were glaciers.

How could this increase biodiversity? The “intermediate disturbance hypothesis” says that biodiversity increases under conditions of mild stress. Some argue this explains the Ordovician radiation.

I’d say this is pretty iffy. But it’s sure interesting! Read more here:

• Birger Schmitz et al., An extraterrestrial trigger for the mid-Ordovician ice age: Dust from the breakup of the L-chondrite parent body, Science Advances, 18 September 2019.

Another fun question is: where are the remains of the L chondrite parent body? Could they be the asteroids in the Flora family?

8 Responses to Ordovician Meteor Event

  1. How do we know there were glaciers half an eon ago?

  2. mattecapu says:

    If the continents were not arranged like today, how come the L-chondrites impacts happened along a line on today’s maps?

    • John Baez says:

      The line of craters probably isn’t as precise as it looks here:

      For a map showing the actual locations of craters go here and scroll down:

      • Wikipedia, Ordovician meteor event.

      Unfortunately that projection makes it a bit hard to see how close the craters are to lying on a line.

      Here are those on the North American plate:

  3. Wolfgang says:

    I guess the dust cooling effect is not a good argument for terraforming like activities to counteract climate change? I know that there seem to be a few proponents of putting aerosols on purpose into the atmosphere, but on the other hand it seems quite risky to do so, in case one does not really understands, what one is doing.

    • Bob says:

      I have not seen an update on the SCoPEx project. They were supposed to have a small trial this year. These people know what they are doing and they aren’t likely to “paint us into a corner”. Sprinkling a little calcium carbonate (chalk/limestone) into the atmosphere is not likely to have more effect than an airline jet contrail. Science is really just a debug and repair process: putting knobs on whatever moves, and spirally in on a “fix”.

      There are many binary star systems. Is that the ‘normal’ result for solar system formation? Is our solar system a failed binary?
      Should Jupiter have become a sun, if it weren’t for …?

    • John Baez says:

      Wolfgang wrote:

      I guess the dust cooling effect is not a good argument for terraforming like activities to counteract climate change?

      In the Ordovician, some people think the dust cooled the Earth so much that it caused an ice age leading to a mass extinction event!

      However, that’s unlikely with human-created dust, or aerosols, because they fall out of the atmosphere pretty quickly… unless we do something dumb like make self-reproducing drones that spray aerosols into the upper atmosphere, and we can’t control them, and they run wild. Let’s not do that!

      A more tricky problem with aerosol cooling is that it will probably not just cool all the Earth evenly; it will affect weather patterns in some more complicated way, and we’d have to try to figure this out.

      No matter what happens, there will be winners and losers, and the losers will be unhappy. But I don’t think this immediately rules out the idea. There are always winners and losers… including for global warming.

      Another problem with aerosol cooling is that it does nothing to help stop ocean acidification. So ocean reefs, and many molluscs, will die out. Mussels are already in trouble.

      But this is not really an argument against aerosol cooling: it’s an argument for cutting carbon emissions.

You can use Markdown or HTML in your comments. You can also use LaTeX, like this: $latex E = m c^2 $. The word 'latex' comes right after the first dollar sign, with a space after it.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.