There’s a workshop this summer:
• Dynamics, Thermodynamics and Information Processing in Chemical Networks, 13-16 June 2017, Complex Systems and Statistical Mechanics Group, University of Luxembourg. Organized by Massimiliano Esposito and Matteo Polettini.
They write, “The idea of the workshop is to bring in contact a small number of high-profile research groups working at the frontier between physics and biochemistry, with particular emphasis on the role of Chemical Networks.”
The speakers may include John Baez, Sophie de Buyl, Massimiliano Esposito, Arren Bar-Even, Christoff Flamm, Ronan Fleming, Christian Gaspard, Daniel Merkle, Philippe Nge, Thomas Ouldridge, Luca Peliti, Matteo Polettini, Hong Qian, Stefan Schuster, Alexander Skupin, Pieter Rein ten Wolde. I believe attendance is by invitation only, so I’ll endeavor to make some of the ideas presented available here at this blog.
Some of the people involved
I’m looking forward to this, in part because there will be a mix of speakers I’ve met, speakers I know but haven’t met, and speakers I don’t know yet. I feel like reminiscing a bit, and I hope you’ll forgive me these reminiscences, since if you try the links you’ll get an introduction to the interface between computation and chemical reaction networks.
In part 25 of the network theory series here, I imagined an arbitrary chemical reaction network and said:
We could try to use these reactions to build a ‘chemical computer’. But how powerful can such a computer be? I don’t know the answer.
Luca Cardelli answered my question in part 26. This was just my first introduction to the wonderful world of chemical computing. Erik Winfree has a DNA and Natural Algorithms Group at Caltech, practically next door to Riverside, and the people there do a lot of great work on this subject. David Soloveichik, now at U. T. Austin, is an alumnus of this group.
In 2014 I met all three of these folks, and many other cool people working on these theme, at a workshop I tried to summarize here:
• Programming with chemical reaction networks, Azimuth, 23 March 2014.
• The computational power of chemical reaction networks, 10 June 2014.
• Chemical reaction network talks, 26 June 2014.
• Trends in reaction network theory (part 1), Azimuth, 27 January 2015.
• Trends in reaction network theory (part 2), Azimuth, 1 July 2015.
Polettini has his own blog, very much worth visiting. For example, you can see his view of the same workshop here:
• Matteo Polettini, Mathematical trends in reaction network theory: part 1 and part 2, Out of Equilibrium, 1 July 2015.
• Information processing and biology, Azimuth, 7 November 2016.
So, I’ve gradually become educated in this area, and I hope that by June I’ll be ready to say something interesting about the semantics of chemical reaction networks. Blake Pollard and I are writing a paper about this now.